When a lawyer goes from the role of an attorney to a judge, one is to expect that he or she is to seek to uphold the law of the United States of America and seeking findings that are fair and just for the citizens.
Juan Merchan has been a part of the Biden Adminstration’s law-fare. A relatively unknown lawyer to date, Juan came to line when his kangeroo court activies came to light as he sought to take President Trump out of running for re-election of the United States executive branch, bankrupt the president, and imprison him.
One news source says-
“The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a former president has substantial immunity for official acts committed while in office.
In the formal motion in July, Trump attorney Todd Blanche pointed to the Supreme Court’s immunity decision, and argued that certain evidence of “official acts” should not have been admitted during the trial.
Specifically, Blanche argued that testimony from former White House Communications Director Hope Hicks; former Special Assistant to the President Madeleine Westerhout; testimony regarding The Special Counsel’s Office and Congressional Investigations and the pardon power; testimony regarding President Trump’s response to FEC Inquiries; his presidential Twitter posts and other related testimony was impermissably admitted during trial. “
Did Juan not get the memo? The citizen’s of the US did not buy his attempts to discredit the former and incoming president. Is it time for the Justice Department to investigate the ethics of Juan’s court?